An analysis of the sedition act of 1798 for the first few years of constitutional government

The Sedition Act of History The Sedition Act of Hamilton pushed for The Bank of the United States, a large standing Army raised by the President Congress was to raise and support armies, a Department of Navy, funding and excise taxes, and, in foreign policy, a neutrality that was sympathetic to British interest to the detriment of France. Many were afraid that the army would be used against them as it had during the Whiskey Rebellion.

An analysis of the sedition act of 1798 for the first few years of constitutional government

If someone with one lunatic boarding received another see John Jacksonthe house needed a licence. If a licensed house with two insane boarders, lost one, the house would cease to be licensed.

The houses with more than one lunatic needed to be licensed, but the kind of care might not differ from that in a single house. In the nineteenth century and earlier some people provided services relating to this whole range of provision.

For example, a physician see Morison and Seymour for example might visit at home were a person was confined by relatives. The same physician might recommend a paid attendant keeper, nurse who would keep guard over the patient.

Alternatively the physician might recommend someone who would arrange single care in lodgings or might recommend a madhouse. In the case of attendants, single houses and madhouses, there would be a variation of financial arrangements between the physician and the attendants and the house.

Often, the physician would receive a regular retainer for making recommendations. Other words used for paid attendants in the early nineteenth century were keeper and nurse.

Nurse was only used for a female attendant or keeper. It should be noted that there were many non-paupers received at similar charges to paupers, and maintained in similar conditions.

Paupers were poor but non-paupers were not necessarily rich! In the midth century all workhouse asylums and most county asylums were exclusively occupied by paupers, although a few county asylums made some provision for others. Most licensed houses did not take paupers.

Only a minority the pauper houses took both or exceptionally only paupers. The pauper houses, however, included the very largest, and as a result over half the lunatics in licensed houses were paupers.

Mental Health History Words

Hospitals received relatively few paupers. Who could be a pauper? In relation to lunacy or illness the potential for being maintained out of public funds was greater than in relation to straightforward poverty. By section 18 a JP would sign a lunatic as a pauper who was "either in receipt of relief, or in such circumstances as to require relief for his proper care" and "for the purposes of this section" "a person who is visited by a medical officer of the union, at the expense of the union" was counted as in receipt of relief.

An analysis of the sedition act of 1798 for the first few years of constitutional government

The legal process that made someone a chancery lunatic was expensive and generally invoked in connection with the preservation of property. Single houses were one of the most expensive forms of confinement. Although there is no logical reason why the term single lunatic should not be applied to insane relatives of the poor confined, or just living, at home; in most of the material I have read the text tends to suggest affluence when this term is used.

The Report does speak of paupers being confined in single houses see quote. As the context suggests they are received for a fee, I suspect that some sort of farming out as in Wales is being thought of.

Having used the concept of single house broadly, the Report distinguishes the affluent class by calling them private patients. Single lunatics were those confined in premises where no other lunatic was kept at the same time. Single houses did not require a licence references Until the admission of a single lunatic did not require a certificateand no returns were made to the Physician Commission.

Certificates were required frombut not, however, for confinement with the relative or the committee of a chancery lunatic where no profit was made.- The Alien and Sedition Acts of The Alien and Sedition Acts were not merely intended for immigrants who spoke out against the government but more to detain the growth of the Democratic - Republican Party.

- For the first few years of Constitutional government, under the leadership of George Washington, there was a unity, commonly. John Adams: John Adams, the first vice president (–97) and second president (–) of the United States.

The watershed event of United States history was the American Civil War (–), fought in North America within the territory of the United States of America, between 24 mostly northern states of the Union and the Confederate States of America, a coalition of eleven southern states that.

The Sedition Act is the most problematic of all the four acts, seeing as it explicitly contradicts the First Amendment. All that freedom of speech and assembly you thought you had?

Early life

Well, if it goes against the government, you don't actually have it. The Sedition Act of (Pub.L. 65–, 40 Stat. , enacted May 16, ) was an Act of the United States Congress that extended the Espionage Act of to cover a broader range of offenses, notably speech and the expression of opinion that cast the government or the war effort in a negative light or interfered with the sale of government bonds.

Not Just Japanese Americans: The Untold Story of U.S. Repression During 'The Good War' Jeffrey Rogers Hummel. I. Pre-Pearl Harbor. The sad saga of civil liberties in the United States during the Second World War begins well before Pearl Harbor.

Article II - The United States Constitution