Her mother was Presbyterianmostly of German including Prussian and some Scottish descent. But I must say, I never felt that. I used to sit and try and figure out how old the child would be, trying to make myself feel guilty. But I never could!
Steinem maintains that her intentions in relaying these experiences are manifold.
But this book is also about setting the record straight. Steinem — who played a pivotal role in popularising second-wave feminism in s America — is now a stately This non-linear autobiography, then, is also an attempt to shore up her legacy in the so-called post-feminist age. Steinem never overtly admits this, of course.
But My Life on the Road consistently labours to combat and correct controversial aspects of the Steinem legend. The first concerns the implications of her unusually good looks, which many allege she exploited for her own ends.
She first rose to national prominence inwhen, as a freelance journalist, she went undercover as a Playboy Bunny and wrote a damning expose of her experiences for Show magazine.
This book is an effective antidote to the two-dimensional pretty-girl stereotype. But if My Life on the Road successfully neutralises attempts at bimboesque pigeon-holing, it also seeks to heal another long-standing rift.
When radical feminism gained political and cultural momentum in United States in the early sactivists refused to elect their own leaders. As a consequence, the media stepped into the void by repeatedly interviewing and profiling more media-savvy activists — namely, Steinem and Germaine Greer.
Many feminists were uneasy with this development, and criticised Steinem and Greer for presumptuously assuming influential roles as feminist figureheads.
She repeatedly emphasises her aversion to the public spotlight throughout the s and well into the s. Moreover, the endurance of this shyness, according to Steinem, generated some serious sour grapes.
Despite making her aversion to the role clear, Steinem was elected in absentia. But her characterisation of her feminism as thoroughly inclusive is more unsettling. Throughout the book, Steinem reiterates her belief in the insidiousness of double discrimination, whereby some women were and are doubly damned by their gender and their race.
Steinem also maintains that she was sympathetic to lesbian feminists, and believed that they had a rightful place within the Movement. Protesters claim De Beers is responsible for the eviction of Kalahari Bushmen from their lands in Botswana. Reuters This thematic preoccupation with inclusivity is clearly a defensive response to lingering criticisms that Steinem helped make the Movement a white, middle-class and elitist affair.
Her portrayal of her feminism as warm and all-encompassing is seductive, until one factors in Ms. As other radical feminists bemoaned, Ms. Gloria Steinem, founder of the feminist magazine Ms. And like all journeys, this one was far from smooth.Learn theory feminist english with free interactive flashcards.
Choose from different sets of theory feminist english flashcards on Quizlet. Helen Gurley Brown in (Reuters) The women’s movement was hijacked and distorted by the sexual revolution.
T he first edition of Betty Friedan’s book, The Feminine Mystique was pro. Would it follow the militant template of Gloria Steinem and Betty Friedan? Or the more gracious approach of Mary Richards?
Thankfully, “The Mary Tyler Moore Show” was a big hit for CBS, and aired for seven seasons. Sep 28, · Women’s movement, diverse social movement, largely based in the United States, seeking equal rights and opportunities for women in their economic activities, their personal lives, and politics.
It is recognized as the “second wave” of the larger feminist movement. Chapter STUDY. PLAY. Which demand was voiced by Betty Friedan, Gloria Steinem, and other members of the feminist movement jn the s and s?
The demand for social and economic equality. Which statement correctly compares Betty Friedan and Phyllis Schlafly? The first edition of Betty Friedan’s book, The Feminine Mystique was pro-family and pro-men.
It made no mention of contraception or abortion. It was a questing philosophical work, not a screed. Seen from the vantage of today’s feminism, these are startling facts.